i walk around with a dazed mind. The eyes are clouded from yesterdays haze. I am left hanging questioning why people did certain things. Disappointed? Nay. Angry? Nay. Words had been said and things had been done prior my knowledge. That explains the redundancy in the evocation of anger, disappointment, pissed-offness or even madness. Now, I am more adrenalined to stay within my shell and shrug all away...
***
Believe you me, I am not angry at you. Though you have intervened...Though you have reeled him into your abyss of miscontrued and thwarted perceptions of MY worries and thoughts...Though you have drowned him in what you thought was IT...Though you have put him on the six-inched ledge and made him believe in something you thought was true, something you thought was mine...Though you have talked, discussed and laid before him what you should not...Though you have displayed the things you should not...Though you have breached my trust...I am not angry at you. Neither am I disappointed. I am feelingless...reactionless...
M*A*L*L*A*S!!!
I am more driven by the psychedelic thrust to just ignore and give up. There is no use in saying anything because you actually do not understand. There is no use in doing anything because you actually do not understand. There is no use in trying because you actually do not understand. Maybe because you do not have stamina to walk alongside me. I am too fast for you. Maybe I unintentionally camouflaged what should be laid down and labeled concisely and specifically JUST to make you understand. And in that, you automatically made the submersion of what should be and should not and merge all as one...I am too complex for you to unravel. I am too complicated for you to catch up. Too little a time for you to know me and comprehend me... You were too ambitious? I was too naive? *shrugZ*
I do not want to talk to you as I am tired. I do not want to see you as I am tired. Trust me. I am neither angry or disappointed. What has been done cannot be undone. I am just tired. This emotional turmoil is hard to shoulder.
Anyways...
Thank you for leading him into your cave of doubt which has been cobwebbed by uncertainties and lingering doubts. Thank you for relaying MY messenges in the form of YOUR misunderstood, miscontrued, misaligned emergence and thwarted perceptions. Thank you for telling him the things YOU thought were MY messenges. Thank you for getting easily psychoed by him into revealing MY issues in the form of YOUR words. Thank you for doing what you should not.
Concluding...
The only solution for him to fully understand MY messenges is to ask I ONLY. Those are MY messenges... MY issues... Who could relay the messenges more perfectly and more straight to the point apart from I? You are not I.
Go figure...
***
A: orang yang mengelilingi kau asyik menyusahkan kau je...kenapa?
B: i did not say that. Those are not my words.
A: yar... I am saying that... That is what i see... Cian kau...
B: again... I did not say that. I truly have no comments to that....
A: *look @me silently*
*shrugZ*
I am not going to say anything. Malas. I am not going to do anything. Malas. What is the use of saying anything when you know that such things are redundant. The purpose of talking is to get across a messenge, no matter whether the person agrees or disagrees. The bottom line is: the correct messenge has to be relayed. The relayed must fully understand the purpose of the messenge, why such a messenge was brewed, how it was evoked and eventually what the relayee wants out of relaying the messenge to the relayed. Thus, the only succesful relay can be done in the form of the RELAYEE and the RELAYED only. Consensus can only be done between them. Strictly between them.
Any intervention or branched relays, NOT from the RELAYEE, might result in the miscommunications and the unintentional erase of certain important specks of messenges. Usually the intervention is done based upon the network of redundant worries and heartache evoked by the BRANCHES' total redundant inquisitiveness or their self-proclaimed loyalties as friends. Either ways, being concerned of both the RELAYED and the RELAYEE's well-being is their only defense.
Such a defense can be used. But, it does not minus the fact that such defense is totally weak. The fort can be bouldered down easily by the fact that the BRANCHES should just leave the situation to time.
Give time, take time...Time heals all wounds...Either the BRANCHES do not have the patience...Or they do not trust and do not have faith in the RELAYEE's capabilities in being able to deal with the problem on his/her own...Hark!
On a personal note, as a RELAYEE whose path has been blocked by the redundant existence of the network of BRANCHES, I still do feel the non-contributions from them would just leave things as it is. Stagnant. It would be the best. Messenges would not be mis-relayed. Messenges would not be miscontrued. Things would be left untouched. If meant to be touched or solved, it should strictly be within the comfort zone of the RELAYEE and the RELAYED only.
But then again, has these BRANCHES been matured and intelligent enough to think of the consequences of their doing BEFORE they actually actioned it? There is a fine line separating the impulsive and irrational from the matured, rational and a refined strategist. That is to be able to think of the possible consequences from ALL possible veins of your actions and anticipate it with a possible counter-action would the crucial criterion. They should also be able to sit and anticipate how the RELAYEE would feel if such intervention would occur. They should also be able to mediate the situation proper by not evoking any possible misunderstandings or add on any redundant judgments on top of the present problems. Such carelessness could lead a bonfire to a raze.
In that, makes a good chess player. There is no room for regret or remorse after that.
But, the evocation of guilt, remorse and the fear of losing someone due to their doings are usually nurtured due to their lack of strategy, irrationality and their impulsive torpedoed need to intervene. If one do not have the ability to counter all these, just by the mere need to intervene thinking that the BRANCHES could make things better, you might as well sit back and do NOTHING.
In the case of your already psyched carelessness and already factful intervention, forget about apologising. Things have been done. No use crying over spilt milk. I do agree that apologies might make people feel better. But then again, such redundant and unrefined intervention could cause anger as the facts of 1) considering that the past of where nothing was done and things were left stagnant could have made people sleep better at nite, and 2) simply knowing that the RELAYEE could have taken his time to get HIS OWN messenges across when the need arises.
But what if the RELAYEE. is not angry at all? Would not that make things worst?
Humans being humans, have this desire to be scolded if they misbehaved, misactioned or mis-said. Such unruly reactions might cause them to feel at peace. But, when they misbehaviors, misactions and mis-says are not caned or even commented upon, they feel uneasy. Worst off to not be bitten. Thus...I shall stay silent...
There is certainly no use of scolding.
There certainly no use of getting angry.
There certainly has no room to say anything.
I shall stay silent.
***
B: ...thank you for clearing my doubts...
C: ...no-no...thank you...
B: aik...asal plak?
C: ...thank you for taking care of her when she is having this problem. thank you for taking care of her especially when i cannot be there for her...thank you...
~~~
Is it my fault to take people's well-being as important? Is it my fault to take silence as my defense? It is definitely better to do as thus rather than to rant and rave. To trumpet to U of what happened and why I am furthering myself could lead U to be angry with me. That in itself could cause a strain in whatever we have.
My words and actions, if I might have decided upon a confrontation, would get several people involved. This, in itself, could cause multiple strains in others' relationships. My mere individual words and actions, if I were to decide to act upon my need to confront, might cause rifts to others. I cannot afford to do that. I cannot afford to be that selfish. What is the use of wanting to make myself feel better and, consequently, i get everyone to stumble upon their roads and make them fall flat on their face? Just to soothe myself?
Hark! Ain't my style.
Have been a very fair player. Have been a good player. Have never stepped upon others to get what I want. Have never back-stabbed anyone so as to clear my roads to any achievements I have bagged for the past 23 years. Never have done that. Will never be that. Will never do that...
do not do unto others what you do not want to be done unto yourself...
I shall not say anything as I will get alot of people into trouble. I will not act upon the call for a cofrontation as such a thing could lead to the born of misunderstandings and rifts into others' relationships. Everything in my life has this domino effect. What I do could lead to another consequence. And the consequence could lead to a subsequent undesired product. If the product, consequences or subsequents are positive, i would walk onto the road of acting on it. But, most of the time, they are negative.
I might be eaten alive inside because I am keeping silent and swallowing whatever I can. Though my capacitance is reaching its maximum, I am trying to overload. I am trying very hard to reformat whatever that has happened. This is better than to get many people involved.
I do have given up.
I am flying my white flag.
I want to unfriend him...